Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Search representations

Results for Gleeson Strategic Land search

New search New search

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Spatial Vision and Strategic Objectives

Representation ID: 2741

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Gleeson Strategic Land

Representation Summary:

Suggest that the vision specifies that more homes will be delivered in the places people want to live.

Full text:

See attachment

Support

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy S2: Settlement Hierarchy

Representation ID: 2742

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Gleeson Strategic Land

Representation Summary:

Support the approach - the approach to housing delivery through assigning a housing figure to a number of parishes to be delivered through NPs or subsequent DPD worked well in the current plan period so it is hoped it work well again.

Full text:

See attachment

Support

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy S3: Development Strategy

Representation ID: 2744

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Gleeson Strategic Land

Representation Summary:

Agree with strategy.

Full text:

See attachment

Support

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy S4: Meeting Housing Needs

Representation ID: 2745

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Gleeson Strategic Land

Representation Summary:

Pleased that the Council will deliver on the standard method. Consider that a 20% buffer should apply.

Table in policy is confusing, suggest that category Parish Housing Requirements is relabelled "Non Strategic Parish Housing Requirements"

Full text:

See attachment

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy S5: Parish Housing Requirements 2016-2035

Representation ID: 2746

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Gleeson Strategic Land

Representation Summary:

Should be made clearer that the same deadline should apply to all NPs, including those that have been identified as strategic development locations.

Full text:

See attachment

Support

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Green Infrastructure

Representation ID: 2748

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Gleeson Strategic Land

Representation Summary:

Agree with inclusion of private gardens, allotments and other features as functional parts of GI. The plan should continue to recognise that development can come forward with a positive impact on biodiversity and can maintain important connections for wildlife through incorporation of suitable GI within new devt.

Full text:

See attachment

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy S30: Strategic Wildlife Corridors

Representation ID: 2749

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Gleeson Strategic Land

Representation Summary:

See attached ecology report.

Fishbourne corridor - ecology report supports opp to bring forward development with sensitively designed/ecologically driven site layout .

Suggest Fbourne corridor extended east of the A27 to acknowledge presence of key connective underpasses and role of habitats east of the A27.

Suggest reword policy.

Full text:

See attachment

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy AL9: Fishbourne Parish

Representation ID: 2751

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Gleeson Strategic Land

Representation Summary:

Gleeson controls and promotes land to the E of Fbourne - believe that suitably designed resi devt can come forward and would have least impact on surrounding landscape; noise can be mitigated; and is in suitable location to maximise transport links.

Full text:

See attachment

Support

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

West of Chichester

Representation ID: 2840

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Gleeson Strategic Land

Representation Summary:

Agree with approach of directing significant proportion of growth towards E-W corridor.

Full text:

See attachment

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.