Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Search representations
Results for Gleeson Strategic Land search
New searchComment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Spatial Vision and Strategic Objectives
Representation ID: 2741
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Gleeson Strategic Land
Suggest that the vision specifies that more homes will be delivered in the places people want to live.
See attachment
Support
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S2: Settlement Hierarchy
Representation ID: 2742
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Gleeson Strategic Land
Support the approach - the approach to housing delivery through assigning a housing figure to a number of parishes to be delivered through NPs or subsequent DPD worked well in the current plan period so it is hoped it work well again.
See attachment
Support
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S3: Development Strategy
Representation ID: 2744
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Gleeson Strategic Land
Agree with strategy.
See attachment
Support
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S4: Meeting Housing Needs
Representation ID: 2745
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Gleeson Strategic Land
Pleased that the Council will deliver on the standard method. Consider that a 20% buffer should apply.
Table in policy is confusing, suggest that category Parish Housing Requirements is relabelled "Non Strategic Parish Housing Requirements"
See attachment
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S5: Parish Housing Requirements 2016-2035
Representation ID: 2746
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Gleeson Strategic Land
Should be made clearer that the same deadline should apply to all NPs, including those that have been identified as strategic development locations.
See attachment
Support
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Green Infrastructure
Representation ID: 2748
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Gleeson Strategic Land
Agree with inclusion of private gardens, allotments and other features as functional parts of GI. The plan should continue to recognise that development can come forward with a positive impact on biodiversity and can maintain important connections for wildlife through incorporation of suitable GI within new devt.
See attachment
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S30: Strategic Wildlife Corridors
Representation ID: 2749
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Gleeson Strategic Land
See attached ecology report.
Fishbourne corridor - ecology report supports opp to bring forward development with sensitively designed/ecologically driven site layout .
Suggest Fbourne corridor extended east of the A27 to acknowledge presence of key connective underpasses and role of habitats east of the A27.
Suggest reword policy.
See attachment
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy AL9: Fishbourne Parish
Representation ID: 2751
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Gleeson Strategic Land
Gleeson controls and promotes land to the E of Fbourne - believe that suitably designed resi devt can come forward and would have least impact on surrounding landscape; noise can be mitigated; and is in suitable location to maximise transport links.
See attachment
Support
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
West of Chichester
Representation ID: 2840
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Gleeson Strategic Land
Agree with approach of directing significant proportion of growth towards E-W corridor.
See attachment