Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Object

Representation ID: 2833

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Casa Coevo

Agent: Verve Planning

Object that Camelsdale is not identified as one of the service villages in the table under para 1.

Object

Representation ID: 2834

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Casa Coevo

Agent: Verve Planning

Object that the Parish Housing Requirement is only 500 and that the provision in the North of the Plan Area is only 489.

Object

Representation ID: 2835

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Casa Coevo

Agent: Verve Planning

Object that Lynchmere does not have a proposed housing figure - can be delivered through Land to the rear of Sturt Avenue

Comment

Representation ID: 2836

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Casa Coevo

Agent: Verve Planning

Promoting site:
Land to the rear of Sturt Avenue, Lynchmere

Object

Representation ID: 2837

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Casa Coevo

Agent: Verve Planning

The policy wording is too restrictive and does not allow flexibility for small scale housing that is not included in policies S3 and S5.

Object

Representation ID: 2839

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Casa Coevo

Agent: Verve Planning

Land to the rear of Sturt Avenue should be within the settlement boundary for Lynchmere