Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Search representations
Results for Gladman search
New searchSupport
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Spatial Vision and Strategic Objectives
Representation ID: 2702
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Gladman
Support the Vision and strategic objectives.
See attachment
Support
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S1: Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development
Representation ID: 2703
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Gladman
Support policy
See attachment
Support
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S2: Settlement Hierarchy
Representation ID: 2704
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Gladman
Broadly support hierarchy but question whether account has been taken of sustainability/services in adjacent settlements and particularly those outside of the District.
See attachment
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S3: Development Strategy
Representation ID: 2705
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Gladman
Suggest amending policy
Amend policy to ensure it is clear what quantum of development is being allocated at each tier
See attachment
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S4: Meeting Housing Needs
Representation ID: 2707
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Gladman
Consider unmet needs of wider area - Brighton, Adur & Worthing, Crawley, Mid Sussex, Horsham and Hampshire authorities.
Council should prepare housing and employment background paper to consider if both levels of growth are balanced.
1% buffer puts council at risk of undersupply - should seek to allocate 20% on top.
Consider policy which sets criteria based approach to devt on edge of settlement boundaries (see Ashford)
See attachment
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S5: Parish Housing Requirements 2016-2035
Representation ID: 2708
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Gladman
No evidence why certain parishes are not subject of proposed allocations.
See attachment
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S8: Meeting Employment Land Needs
Representation ID: 2709
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Gladman
CDC need to consider interrelationship of housing and employment and whether planned employment provision will require uplift in housing requirement
See attachment
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S24: Countryside
Representation ID: 2710
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Gladman
Revise policy to ensure plan flexibility e.g. edge of settlement boundaries
See attachment
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy DM22: Development in the Countryside
Representation ID: 2711
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Gladman
Revise policy to ensure plan flexibility e.g. edge of settlement boundaries
See attachment
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy DM2: Housing Mix
Representation ID: 2712
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Gladman
Support that Council recognise factors which may mean devt need to depart from housing mix
Policy to consider that higher proportion of lower bedroom properties does not reflect demand
See attachment
