Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Search representations

Results for Friends of Pagham Harbour search

New search New search

Support

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy S30: Strategic Wildlife Corridors

Representation ID: 2565

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Friends of Pagham Harbour

Representation Summary:

We support proposal for wildlife corridors. We have been strong proponents of the Pagham Rife wildlife corridor which stretches from Pagham Harbour to Chichester.

Full text:

The trustees of the Friends of Pagham Harbour (a registered charity) met yesterday to discuss the Chichester Local Plan. We wish to make the following points:

* We support to proposal for wildlife corridors. We have been strong proponents of the Pagham Rife wildlife corridor which stretches from Pagham Harbour to Chichester.
* We are concerned about the impacts additional housing will have on existing infrastructure, particularly the sewage system. During the winter months Pagham Harbour suffers several sewage spills per week into the Pagham Rife due to storm surges and this will only increase should further housing be built. Furthermore, other seage treatment plants that discharge into rifes which flow into Pagham Harbour will be similarly affected.
* We are struggling to understand why the buffer zone around Pagham Harbour is smaller than that around Chichester Harbour.
* We are concerned about the increased traffic on the Chichester-Selsey road (B2145). This road has to be crossed by those walking or cycling from Pagham Harbour to Medmerry and expect more accidents will happen unless better crossing facilities are provided.

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy S31: Wastewater Management and Water Quality

Representation ID: 2566

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Friends of Pagham Harbour

Representation Summary:

We are concerned about the impacts additional housing will have on existing infrastructure, particularly the sewage system. During the winter months Pagham Harbour suffers several sewage spills per week into the Pagham Rife due to storm surges and this will only increase should further housing be built. Furthermore, other seage treatment plants that discharge into rifes which flow into Pagham Harbour will be similarly affected.

Full text:

The trustees of the Friends of Pagham Harbour (a registered charity) met yesterday to discuss the Chichester Local Plan. We wish to make the following points:

* We support to proposal for wildlife corridors. We have been strong proponents of the Pagham Rife wildlife corridor which stretches from Pagham Harbour to Chichester.
* We are concerned about the impacts additional housing will have on existing infrastructure, particularly the sewage system. During the winter months Pagham Harbour suffers several sewage spills per week into the Pagham Rife due to storm surges and this will only increase should further housing be built. Furthermore, other seage treatment plants that discharge into rifes which flow into Pagham Harbour will be similarly affected.
* We are struggling to understand why the buffer zone around Pagham Harbour is smaller than that around Chichester Harbour.
* We are concerned about the increased traffic on the Chichester-Selsey road (B2145). This road has to be crossed by those walking or cycling from Pagham Harbour to Medmerry and expect more accidents will happen unless better crossing facilities are provided.

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy S23: Transport and Accessibility

Representation ID: 2567

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Friends of Pagham Harbour

Representation Summary:

We are concerned about the increased traffic on the Chichester-Selsey road (B2145). This road has to be crossed by those walking or cycling from Pagham Harbour to Medmerry and expect more accidents will happen unless better crossing facilities are provided.

Full text:

The trustees of the Friends of Pagham Harbour (a registered charity) met yesterday to discuss the Chichester Local Plan. We wish to make the following points:

* We support to proposal for wildlife corridors. We have been strong proponents of the Pagham Rife wildlife corridor which stretches from Pagham Harbour to Chichester.
* We are concerned about the impacts additional housing will have on existing infrastructure, particularly the sewage system. During the winter months Pagham Harbour suffers several sewage spills per week into the Pagham Rife due to storm surges and this will only increase should further housing be built. Furthermore, other seage treatment plants that discharge into rifes which flow into Pagham Harbour will be similarly affected.
* We are struggling to understand why the buffer zone around Pagham Harbour is smaller than that around Chichester Harbour.
* We are concerned about the increased traffic on the Chichester-Selsey road (B2145). This road has to be crossed by those walking or cycling from Pagham Harbour to Medmerry and expect more accidents will happen unless better crossing facilities are provided.

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy DM30: Development and Disturbance of Birds in Chichester, Langstone and Pagham Harbours Special Protection Areas

Representation ID: 2568

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Friends of Pagham Harbour

Representation Summary:

We are struggling to understand why the buffer zone around Pagham Harbour is smaller than that around Chichester Harbour.

Full text:

The trustees of the Friends of Pagham Harbour (a registered charity) met yesterday to discuss the Chichester Local Plan. We wish to make the following points:

* We support to proposal for wildlife corridors. We have been strong proponents of the Pagham Rife wildlife corridor which stretches from Pagham Harbour to Chichester.
* We are concerned about the impacts additional housing will have on existing infrastructure, particularly the sewage system. During the winter months Pagham Harbour suffers several sewage spills per week into the Pagham Rife due to storm surges and this will only increase should further housing be built. Furthermore, other seage treatment plants that discharge into rifes which flow into Pagham Harbour will be similarly affected.
* We are struggling to understand why the buffer zone around Pagham Harbour is smaller than that around Chichester Harbour.
* We are concerned about the increased traffic on the Chichester-Selsey road (B2145). This road has to be crossed by those walking or cycling from Pagham Harbour to Medmerry and expect more accidents will happen unless better crossing facilities are provided.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.