Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Search representations
Results for Chichester City Council search
New searchComment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy DM3: Housing Density
Representation ID: 215
Received: 10/01/2019
Respondent: Chichester City Council
The policy relating to city centre housing density of at least 35dph was not considered to be particularly helpful, as it is arbitrary and, in practice, density depends very much on site constraints and surrounding context.
The policy relating to city centre housing density of at least 35dph was not considered to be particularly helpful, as it is arbitrary and, in practice, density depends very much on site constraints and surrounding context.
The policy relating to Chichester city centre was generally supported as relevant and positive.
There was significant concern about reduction of town centre parking provision. Concerns were that this may affect the vitality and viability of the city centre and that any parking changes may disproportionately affect older and less mobile residents as well those encumbered by purchases all of whom rely on close and convenient access to parking.
It was suggested that park and ride should be looked into, although it was noted that it had been investigated as part of the District Council's background documents. It was also noted that any changes to parking provision or restrictions should tie in with the road space audit.
Support
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S13: Chichester City Development Principles
Representation ID: 216
Received: 10/01/2019
Respondent: Chichester City Council
The policy relating to Chichester city centre was generally supported as relevant and positive.
The policy relating to city centre housing density of at least 35dph was not considered to be particularly helpful, as it is arbitrary and, in practice, density depends very much on site constraints and surrounding context.
The policy relating to Chichester city centre was generally supported as relevant and positive.
There was significant concern about reduction of town centre parking provision. Concerns were that this may affect the vitality and viability of the city centre and that any parking changes may disproportionately affect older and less mobile residents as well those encumbered by purchases all of whom rely on close and convenient access to parking.
It was suggested that park and ride should be looked into, although it was noted that it had been investigated as part of the District Council's background documents. It was also noted that any changes to parking provision or restrictions should tie in with the road space audit.
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S14: Chichester City Transport Strategy
Representation ID: 217
Received: 10/01/2019
Respondent: Chichester City Council
There was significant concern about reduction of town centre parking provision. Concerns were that this may affect the vitality and viability of the city centre and that any parking changes may disproportionately affect older and less mobile residents as well those encumbered by purchases all of whom rely on close and convenient access to parking.
Park and ride should be looked into, although it was noted that it had been investigated as part of the District Council's background documents. It was also noted that any changes to parking provision or restrictions should tie in with the road space audit.
The policy relating to city centre housing density of at least 35dph was not considered to be particularly helpful, as it is arbitrary and, in practice, density depends very much on site constraints and surrounding context.
The policy relating to Chichester city centre was generally supported as relevant and positive.
There was significant concern about reduction of town centre parking provision. Concerns were that this may affect the vitality and viability of the city centre and that any parking changes may disproportionately affect older and less mobile residents as well those encumbered by purchases all of whom rely on close and convenient access to parking.
It was suggested that park and ride should be looked into, although it was noted that it had been investigated as part of the District Council's background documents. It was also noted that any changes to parking provision or restrictions should tie in with the road space audit.