Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Support

Representation ID: 2628

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: Barton Willmore

Support Southbourne as settlement hub.

Support

Representation ID: 2629

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: Barton Willmore

Support distribution

Comment

Representation ID: 2630

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: Barton Willmore

Consider that work should be done to assess new junction onto A27 at Southbourne.

Should make clear that list of works detailed is not exhaustive as not all development land is being allocated in plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 2631

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: Barton Willmore

No umet need for neighbouring authorities proposed to be met.

Exceptional circumstances exist for using OAN figure within HEDNA as opposed to standard methodology and CDC should be meeting higher figure e.g. 1000dpa

Support

Representation ID: 2632

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: Barton Willmore

Support policy but not sufficient consideration to other benefits provided by development where 30% AH is unviable.

NPs should not be able to increase AH level required.

Comment

Representation ID: 2633

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: Barton Willmore

Concerns that no clear vision as to type of place being created/where employment fits in - should be overall vision.

More flexible approach to employment (like retail) should be taken.

Need for updated Employment Land Review.

Comment

Representation ID: 2634

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: Barton Willmore

Supportive of policy to protect existing retail but concerned that does not make provision for scale of retail which could be supported by new strategic development

Comment

Representation ID: 2636

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: Barton Willmore

Should be further provision for large scale/strategic developments where a greater retail provision can be supported without having a negative impact on the main centre.

Policy does not correlate with S9.

Support

Representation ID: 2637

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: Barton Willmore

We support this policy however additional provision should be made to allow for
significant infrastructure improvements to be part funded by the Council or through grant funding where they are of wider benefit than simply being required to make a
development acceptable. e.g. Highways England and Housing Infrastructure Fund.

Support

Representation ID: 2638

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: Barton Willmore

Support policy.