Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Search representations
Results for West Sussex County Council search
New searchObject
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Chichester City
Representation ID: 3308
Received: 05/02/2019
Respondent: West Sussex County Council
Agent: Savills Plc
Plan should acknowledge role of former Tannery Site in delivering housing in Chichester city.
See attachment
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Employment
Representation ID: 3310
Received: 05/02/2019
Respondent: West Sussex County Council
Agent: Savills Plc
Para 7.54 refers to regularly reviewing existing employment sites. The Tannery site in Westgate has not been assessed. It is not preferred location for offices and it should be released for housing.
See attachment
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy DM9: Existing Employment Sites
Representation ID: 3311
Received: 05/02/2019
Respondent: West Sussex County Council
Agent: Savills Plc
Policy wording is overly rigorous and could prevent appropriate development from coming forward.
See attachment
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S5: Parish Housing Requirements 2016-2035
Representation ID: 3314
Received: 05/02/2019
Respondent: West Sussex County Council
Agent: Savills Plc
50 units for Chichester is very low and does not encourage development of appropriate PDL. Land is available at the Tannery site, Westgate to accommodate 30 units - it is a strategic site for Chichester
See attachment
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S8: Meeting Employment Land Needs
Representation ID: 3316
Received: 05/02/2019
Respondent: West Sussex County Council
Agent: Savills Plc
Policy wording is overly rigorous and could prevent appropriate development from coming forward.
See attachment
