Draft A27 Chichester Bypass Mitigation Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) Version 2 - May 2024
Search representations
Results for Fishbourne Parish Council search
New searchComment
Draft A27 Chichester Bypass Mitigation Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) Version 2 - May 2024
1.0 Introduction
Representation ID: 6485
Received: 20/06/2024
Respondent: Fishbourne Parish Council
Para 1.1 We welcome the recognition that the additional traffic as a result of new building will impact on “the A257 Chichester Bypass junctions and the associated local highway network. This is particularly so where the road is “already at full capacity” (A27 and A259) and country lanes whose design and quality of foundation render them unfit for purpose.
Para 1.1 We welcome the recognition that the additional traffic as a result of new building will impact on “the A257 Chichester Bypass junctions and the associated local highway network. This is particularly so where the road is “already at full capacity” (A27 and A259) and country lanes whose design and quality of foundation render them unfit for purpose.
Comment
Draft A27 Chichester Bypass Mitigation Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) Version 2 - May 2024
Funding collected or secured to April 2024
Representation ID: 6486
Received: 20/06/2024
Respondent: Fishbourne Parish Council
We urge the District Council to continue to press for Central Government funding where costs are the direct result of Government target setting .
We urge the District Council to continue to press for Central Government funding where costs are the direct result of Government target setting .
Comment
Draft A27 Chichester Bypass Mitigation Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) Version 2 - May 2024
The level of development anticipated
Representation ID: 6487
Received: 20/06/2024
Respondent: Fishbourne Parish Council
Para 2.14 Given the lack of funding from the Government and the gap between the 2016 SPD calculation and the present costs, there would seem to be no alternative to seeking an increase in contribution from developers for applications between now and the adoption of the revised Local Plan.
Para 2.14 Given the lack of funding from the Government and the gap between the 2016 SPD calculation and the present costs, there would seem to be no alternative to seeking an increase in contribution from developers for applications between now and the adoption of the revised Local Plan.
Comment
Draft A27 Chichester Bypass Mitigation Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) Version 2 - May 2024
National Policy and Guidance
Representation ID: 6488
Received: 20/06/2024
Respondent: Fishbourne Parish Council
Para 3.4 We support the reason for action now, since waiting for the approval of the new Local Plan would mean applications would not need to mitigate the impact on the A27 and would therefore be in conflict with Policy 9 of the adopted Local Plan.
Para 3.4 We support the reason for action now, since waiting for the approval of the new Local Plan would mean applications would not need to mitigate the impact on the A27 and would therefore be in conflict with Policy 9 of the adopted Local Plan.
Support
Draft A27 Chichester Bypass Mitigation Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) Version 2 - May 2024
Local Planning Policy
Representation ID: 6489
Received: 20/06/2024
Respondent: Fishbourne Parish Council
Para 3.9 We totally support the requirement in Policy 9 that all development must provide or fund new infrastructure, and where appropriate, mitigate the impact of the development on existing infrastructure, facilities or services.
Para 3.9 We totally support the requirement in Policy 9 that all development must provide or fund new infrastructure, and where appropriate, mitigate the impact of the development on existing infrastructure, facilities or services.
