Index-linking Contributions

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Comment

A27 Chichester Bypass Mitigation Supplementary Planning Document - August 2023

Representation ID: 6333

Received: 08/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Pieter Montyn

Representation Summary:

Paras 5.9 and 5.10 set out how developer contributions will be index-linked for price fluctuations in road construction tenders and contracts. How the cost of future ‘creep’ of National Highway requirements will be allowed for is not covered: this presents an open-ended situation without any limits on National Highways but putting the onus on CDC to catch up and carry out future SPD reviews

Full text:

Paras 5.9 and 5.10 set out how developer contributions will be index-linked for price fluctuations in road construction tenders and contracts. How the cost of future ‘creep’ of National Highway requirements will be allowed for is not covered: this presents an open-ended situation without any limits on National Highways but putting the onus on CDC to catch up and carry out future SPD reviews

Support

A27 Chichester Bypass Mitigation Supplementary Planning Document - August 2023

Representation ID: 6352

Received: 17/10/2023

Respondent: Fishbourne Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Support

Full text:

Support

Comment

A27 Chichester Bypass Mitigation Supplementary Planning Document - August 2023

Representation ID: 6376

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: East Wittering & Bracklesham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Paras 5.9 and 5.10 set out how developer contributions will be index-linked for price fluctuations in road construction tenders and contracts. How the cost of future ‘creep’ of National Highway requirements will be allowed for is not covered: this presents an open-ended situation without any limits on National Highways but putting the onus on CDC to catch up and carry out future SPD reviews

Full text:

Paras 5.9 and 5.10 set out how developer contributions will be index-linked for price fluctuations in road construction tenders and contracts. How the cost of future ‘creep’ of National Highway requirements will be allowed for is not covered: this presents an open-ended situation without any limits on National Highways but putting the onus on CDC to catch up and carry out future SPD reviews

Comment

A27 Chichester Bypass Mitigation Supplementary Planning Document - August 2023

Representation ID: 6391

Received: 02/11/2023

Respondent: Sidlesham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Paras 5.9 and 5.10 do not explain how the cost-impact of any future National Highways’ “requirements creep” will be met. Being effectively unrestricted, without any limits on National Highways, will place CDC in the invidious position of having to catch up and carry out future SPD reviews.

Full text:

Paras 5.9 and 5.10 do not explain how the cost-impact of any future National Highways’ “requirements creep” will be met. Being effectively unrestricted, without any limits on National Highways, will place CDC in the invidious position of having to catch up and carry out future SPD reviews.