Manhood Peninsula

Object

Representation ID: 288

Received: 21/01/2019

Respondent: Mr Peter Balaam

The proposed development is far too near the AONB, the Special protection Area and the Site of Special Scientific Interest. There would be adverse impact on the special ecology of the area and mitigation is not sufficient to alter this fact.

Object

Representation ID: 360

Received: 26/01/2019

Respondent: Mrs Alison Balaam

Chichester Harbour and the surrounding area are designated as an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. it seems to me totally inappropriate that such high levels of development should be considered in this area.
Green tourism, a very important part of the Manhood Peninsula's economy, would be seriously affected by over-development on this scale.

Object

Representation ID: 905

Received: 03/02/2019

Respondent: mrs Patricia Carroll

Any housing built on the Manhood peninsular should be carbon neutral to reduce pollution and save energy. I cannot find any mention of this in the documents

Object

Representation ID: 2373

Received: 25/01/2019

Respondent: Mr Carey Mackinnon

So in summary the plan talks about congested rural roads and such phrases as discouraging HGV's there but the plan to build hundreds and maybe thousands more houses on the Manhood Peninsula does not represent these points.
Highways West Sussex have no mechanism to look at the combined effect of multiple sites.

Comment

Representation ID: 2899

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: Councillor Christopher Page

Para 4.121: 3rd bullet: While acknowledging the poor accessibility and congestion caused by the A27 to those on the Manhood peninsula, the report makes no reference to another major problem, that of the Chaos caused to people in the south during the increasing number of events at Goodwood, which result in the peninsula being virtually cut off for several individual days.