Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 819

Received: 02/02/2019

Respondent: Fishbourne Parish Council

Representation Summary:

2 examples of sharp contrasts between policies and practice would seem to make the whole document unsafe. Which is the examiner to accept as the truth?
The two examples are detailed in the Representation section above.

Full text:

6.65

This is one of many examples where policy and practice are at variance. "Protecting the separate distinct identity of Fishbourne" was one of the top priorities in the Village Survey and I am pleased to see it referred to in 6.65. However, as the HELAA and the Local Plan Review have created a situation where the arbitrary figure of 250 could be met only by starting to build on Bethwines there is a sharp conflict between policy and practice since Bethwines Farm is the only gap left at Fishbourne's borders.
Policy DM8 is another example of conflict between policies and practice. The policy boldly states that "any development must minimize and not create or add to problems of highway safety, congestion, air pollution or other damage" - whereas in practice 2,300 houses are scheduled to be built along the corridor between Chichester and Southbourne. The A259 is already operating beyond its safe capacity and the delays caused at Fishbourne and subsequent roundabouts along the Chichester bypass are not only bad for the regional economy but also for the health of those breathing in the increased pollution.